'Are dynamic procedures superior to static in treating the paralytic eyelid in facial paralysis?'

BACKGROUND: Facial nerve weakness can cause deficient eye closure with reduced corneal protection. Surgical remedies can be static to oppose the levator muscle (lid loading) or dynamic procedures, which act to increase the strength of closure. This retrospective cohort study compares these groups. The hypothesis is that dynamic reconstruction has advantages over static techniques in terms of eye closure, symptomatic improvement, blink restoration, and complication rate. METHODS: Two cohorts were compared: those treated with a gold weight insertion into the upper eyelid and those who had received dynamic reconstruction. These included temporalis transfer; cross face nerve grafting alone (CFNG) and CFNG followed by free tissue transfer. Assessments included standard photography and video; measurement of eyelid excursion including residual gap and if full eye closure was possible. The presence of the blink reflex and symptoms of dry eye was assessed. RESULTS: Overall improvement in eye closure was similar with the gold weight compared to dynamic procedures (5.1 mm vs 5.3 mm). Dynamic procedures however gave improved results in terms of symptom relief and restoration of blink. They also had fewer complications and revision rates overall. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the hypothesis that dynamic reconstructions of the paralysed eyelid confer advantages compared to simple lid loading techniques. Improvements in lid excursion are similar, but symptom improvement and blink restoration are significantly better. A decision regarding eyelid reanimation should be made early in the patient's journey of facial reanimation to allow for accurate planning and placement of nerve grafts at an early stage.

Combining an end to side nerve to masseter transfer with cross face nerve graft for functional upgrade in partial facial paralysis-an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Results of a single stage technique combining cross facial nerve graft(s) (CFNG) with an ipsilateral end to side nerve to masseter transfer (NTM) in incomplete facial paralysis are assessed in a retrospective cohort study. The hypothesis is that the technique can safely improve the quality of smile in these patients. End to side coaptations for the recipient facial nerve minimise the risk of iatrogenic function loss, contrasting with the end to end neurorrhaphies used in conventional babysitting procedures. METHODS: A series of 27 patients was studied through case note review and standardised assessments. Surgical technique involves extensive exposure of the facial nerve and the NTM on the affected side and access is by bilateral preauricular incisions. End to end coaptations are made to the facial nerve on the donor side and on the recipient a standard CFNG is combined with an end to side NTM coaptation. Follow up was a minimum of 9 months from surgery. RESULTS: Overall improvement in the Sunnybrook scale averaged 33, from a pre-operative score of 40 (p < 0.05). Average upgrade of 4.7 mm of increased movement at the modiolus was achieved (p < 0.05), 43% improvement compared to the normal side. An improved resting symmetry of 3.8 mm was achieved in relevant cases. Where eye closure was strengthened the average improvement was 5 mm of increased lid closure. The smile achieved was spontaneous in 22 of 27 cases. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the hypothesis that CFNG with NTM transfer offers a physiological upgrade of facial movement in partial facial paralysis, applicable in both early and longstanding cases.